To me DRINK RESPONSIBLY means...
... Don't spill it.

Today's Birthdays
Bernard
Wha Sup?

-25 Years and older are eligible for judging-

All Years Welcomed!
-25 Years and older are eligible for judging-
Featured Chat Guy (or Gal)
Registered: 01/21/12
Posts: 4
VCCA Member Photos
Chevy heater?: Tropic-Aire
Corvette
Chevy heater?
My 364441 Super Heterodyne Radio
1930 Front Brakes - Backing Plate
Battery disconnect  300A
VCCA Projects
My 31' Sedan Special #2
My 31's Cowl
M1009 K5 Blazer
My 31' Sedan Special
Almost ready for paint!
Top Posters
Junkyard Dog 24035
Chev Nut 18878
Chipper 13427
MrMack 11152
AntiqueMechanic 8820
42bill 4886
Bill Barker 4674
wawuzit 4446
Tiny 3700
41specialdeluxe 3468
tonyw 3054
kevin47 2748
chef-chevy 2582
jack39rdstr 2476
Back Roads 2409
Top Posters (over the past 30 Days)
Junkyard Dog 185
Chev Nut 183
Chipper 125
BearsFan315 73
Ken_Naber 66
jack39rdstr 63
brewster 62
kevin47 49
Chistech 48
Rustoholic 45
Tiny 44
chef-chevy 43
ruscar 42
John 348/340HP 40
ChevyGuru 39
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#195076 - 01/14/11 08:09 AM 216 vs. 235 Essential Difference
41guy Offline

Shade Tree Mechanic

Registered: 01/02/11
Posts: 96
Loc: MS, USA
What is (are) the essential difference(s) between a 216 from a 235? Putting aside things like type of bearings & side covers & valve covers, when does a 216 become a 235? I guess what I'm asking is: what actually accounts for the 19 cu.in. difference?

Top
#195079 - 01/14/11 08:22 AM Re: 216 vs. 235 Essential Difference [Re: 41guy]
MrMack Offline



Registered: 12/14/01
Posts: 11152
Loc: Central Texas
a 216 never becomes a 235. The 235 CI engine was first used in the Chevrolet trucks, then when Chevrolet introduced the Powerglide transmission They built a 235 engine for it with hydraulic lifters, and some other driver convenience mods like the automatic choke. The 216 engine was used up thru 1952 for manual shift cars and some trucks used a 216 even later than 1953. In 1953 Chevrolet went to 235 engines in all passanger cars, the standard shift and trucks stuck with manual chokes and mechanical lifters. In 1954 Chevrolet introduced the 261 CI engine for the larger trucks, and it was available until sometine around 1962.
_________________________
Life's a long winding trail, love Jesus and ride a good horse!

Top
#195084 - 01/14/11 09:02 AM Re: 216 vs. 235 Essential Difference [Re: 41guy]
Junkyard Dog Offline




Registered: 11/23/01
Posts: 24035
Loc: Eagle Point, Oregon
Quote:
I guess what I'm asking is: what actually accounts for the 19 cu.in. difference?


The bore and the stroke.

laugh wink beer2
_________________________
The Mangy Old Mutt

"If It's Not Junk.....It's Not Treasure!"

Top
#195093 - 01/14/11 10:11 AM Re: 216 vs. 235 Essential Difference [Re: Junkyard Dog]
41guy Offline

Shade Tree Mechanic

Registered: 01/02/11
Posts: 96
Loc: MS, USA
Thanks, Mr. Mack for excellent explanation of the evolution; and thanks to Junkyard Dog for zeroing in on the bottom line.


Top
#195105 - 01/14/11 11:24 AM Re: 216 vs. 235 Essential Difference [Re: 41guy]
ChevyGuru Offline


1000

Registered: 01/27/02
Posts: 1326
Loc: Medina, Ohio, USA
MrMack -

You may have presented me with an opportunity to learn something here.

What truck had a 216 after 1953? I am not aware of the 216 being used in anything after the '53 trucks.

Thanks.
_________________________
Chevy Guru

Top
#195126 - 01/14/11 05:00 PM Re: 216 vs. 235 Essential Difference [Re: ChevyGuru]
MrMack Offline



Registered: 12/14/01
Posts: 11152
Loc: Central Texas
Well I meant that some trucks had 216 engines in 1953. Of course since the bore and stroke determine the CI I figured that was apparent. But yeah it could have just been the bore or just the stroke difference. Kind of like what is the difference between a 350 SB and a 400 SB? Or a 235 and a 261?
_________________________
Life's a long winding trail, love Jesus and ride a good horse!

Top
#195135 - 01/14/11 06:30 PM Re: 216 vs. 235 Essential Difference [Re: MrMack]
Chev Nut Offline




Registered: 01/08/02
Posts: 18878
Loc: West Allis,Wi.
I didn't bother to read the above posts .
The first 235 was used in large 1941-1949 trucks. It looked just like a 216 but had the larger bore and longer stroke.
The block was slightly taller and had the larger bore. The crankshaft was different so as to increase the stroke. The pistons and rings were different due to the bore increase. The camshaft was different to clear the new crankshaft. All other parts were the same with a few minor exceptions.

The 1950-1952 235 used in Power Glide cars and large trucks was almostly completely different. It had a larger carburetor, intake and exhaust manifold, different block with the low side cover, larger intake valves, so the breathing was increased to match the larger displacement.

The 1953 235 truck (large) and stick shift pasenger cars has that engine with some tweaks to the block (made stronger) slightly smaller intake valves . stronger connecting rods, more head bolts and higher compression ratio.
The 1953 Power glide engine had the same head but with a drilled full pressure oiling crankshaft, conn. rod inserts, aluminum pistons, and a higher compression ratio due to taller pistons. In 1954 all engines were 235 with a few slight changes on up through 1962.
The 1950_1962 Powr Glide engines had hydraulic lifters and from 1956 and up all passenger car engines had hydraulics.
_________________________
Chevgene

Top


Moderator:  ken48 
Your Status
Please login to post or reply.* * *
Send My Password
Who's Online
5 Chat Members (lachlan31, terry hicks, chevnovice, milkshaker, dunfire), 28 Lookie Loo's and 8 Spiders or Bots online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
We speak Chevy!
Time Flys!Since 12/16/2001
Previous Photo
Newest Chat Registration
bethherner, drdrums, Aford, 74woody, DocArt
12880 Registered Users
VCCA Info Links
NEWBIES START HERE
CHAT HELP
* * *
Send My Password
Kill My Chat Cookies
* * *
VCCA Home
G&D Calendar
Judging
Club Regions
Join Info
* * * *
Forum Stats
12880 Chat Users
64 Forums
40902 Topics
295630 Posts

Max Online: 209 @ 05/12/11 08:44 PM
See the USA
In your Dinah says Hi!!

 

Notice: Any comments posted herein do not necessarily reflect the official position of the VCCA.